Today conspiracy theory addicts live in paradise. They get an enormous amount of material, and can use it until they reach a sheer delirium, caught in an electrifying mixture of the real, the unreal, the absurd and the surreal. In the haze of disinformation, surreal propaganda and sheer idiocy finally a few glimpses of the truth are visible....

One of the most popular conspiracy tales is the rise and fall of an individual called Alois Schicklgruber, a native Austrian that later lost his citizenship, an individual that ran a career of, say, super-american quality, starting from nowhere ( as a bum in Vienna ), climbing up one or two ladders in the german army, getting started in politics, supported massively by a bunch of decadent aristocrats as well as "modern-age"-industrialists and bankers, financed by an international consortium of unprecendeted nature.....

Later, it is said, he set the german parliament on fire, neutralized the deputies in there, expect one fraction that later got imprisoned for that, made it to the position of ( as a matter of fact ) god-emperor, developed a sinister plan to take revenge on the Jews and ran one of the most extraordinary looting activities in history.

The tale is simply outrageous in its defiance of reality. How can an austrian bum  gain german citizenship in 1932, become chancellor one year later, make it to the position of god-emperor in a fairly civilized, still decadent environment, and then, as a side effect, conquer almost the entire european continent ? The tale producers refer to this fellow as Hitler, Adolf. Incredible, isn´t it, but the tale is widely believed.

Then, the conspiracy theologists indicate, there was a military government in Germany, equipped with a few thousand so called "nuclear warheads" which in the case of usage would have left a deep black hole behind and not much more than that. They even claim that the global security system was based on a mechanism called "Mutual Assured Destruction" or, later
" Flexible response", which would have led straight into the apocalypse if  activated.

Can you imagine such an outrageous theory is also believed almost everywhere ?

Then there was a particularly interesting theory that created something referred to as "The Wall ". It is evident that this monstrous theory originated in the mind of a completely psychoed-out whacko, recommended treatment heavy dosages of tranquilizers, or, in case of notorious therapy resistance, brain amputation. The Wall, it is told and believed, surgically divided an entire country into two parts and arrested – as a matter of fact – approximately 16 million people called "Ossis".

You see, in the wonderful world of conspiracy theories everything is possible. If getting deeper into the matter, you´ll encounter a sheer unimaginable universe of  mysteries, unexplained phenomena, bizarre plots, outrageous perversions, horrendous criminal activities, tales of unprecedented failure as well as unimaginable success, all this mixed with the grim smile of the apocalypse discretely lagging behind it.

A few further examples:

To explain the rise of Schicklgruber, the austrian bum, to the position of god emperor it is commonly accepted among conspiracy theory producers that he received enormous financial help delivered by an international conglomerate that intended to contain, if not remove, an entity called  "Soviet Union". What else ? The Soviet Union, as is believed widely, came into existence after a handful of adventurous german top generals, among them a figure called Ludendorff, transferred some of the leading Bolsheviks from Switzerland to Russia, igniting a revolution in 1917. Ludendorff  became somewhat famous due to his early cooperation with Schicklgruber ( called "The Drummer" ) that somehow led to a failed coup in 1923, a short stay of Schicklgruber in a bavarian prison, where he produced a well-known book called " My Fight". In the mid-twenties, it is alleged, a consortium of Wall Street bankers constructed an entity named  IG Farben, a cartel that consisted of the main german chemical companies, thereby shaping the largest chemical firm in the world at the time.

IG Farben later became the primary sponsor of Schicklgrubers activities, and it is also said to have provided the "New Order“ with its security knowledge, leading to the construction of a secret police called Gestapo. The list of sponsors that
– by today´s standards – donated enormous sums of laundered money reads like a Who is Who of  the leading  corporations - mainly in the USA and Germany - at that time, most of them still on the top of the economic hierarchy. Incredible....

Outrageous allegations abound. Among them: IG Farben entered into an almost worldwide cartel agreement with the other major chemical and petrol companies in 1928, defining market shares with respect to almost any detail imaginable. There were patent pools run by the cartel members, and numerous cross-over-share deals. So IG Farben was partially run by several petrol companies, and is said to have owned shares in several oil firms as well.

As is stated, there are several other cartels of this type, regulating the steel industries, for example, or the copper industries, or the manufacturers of electric goods and so on. Wars came and passed, the cartels remained. They survived even the period of 1939-1945. States disappeared, the cartels did not.

In this truly democratic and capitalist world this outlandish allegation can only be regarded as irrational. Right or not ? Is it believable that an austrian bum makes it to the position of   god-emperor ? No, not really....financed by an international consortium ?

But the criminal energy of these conspiracy desinformationists cannot be properly described without some of the even worse allegations that they produce.

They go as far as to create the myth that not only IG Farben, but a variety of other Germany - based multinationals donated enormous amounts of  ( black ) monies to promote the rise of Schicklgruber, but also an astonishing selection of US-based companies, that later became the more privileged suppliers of the Nazi war machine. In the late nineties a number of unscrupulous lawyers got hired to file an astonishing number of lawsuits, and ad campaigns were run to emphasize that this theory was a true reality. One of the Third Reich´s major creditors was the Bank of England, due to these conspiracy theory producers, and a handful of blue-blooded aristocrats were fervent admirers of the austrian bum....oh no.

Then the theories start to become really dark. The SS-IG Farben comglomerate later allegedly ran soap factories, using the remains of gassed Europeans as a raw material, also to produce gold, furniture components and so on, as well as a medical-scientific complex based on experimentation with humans ( remember the patent pools....). The paper material archived in this context is vast, as conspiracy producers state. The soap cartel now controls a good part of the worldwide seed production, as well as the production of fertilizers or insecticides. Well, you are what you eat, right ? Good luck this is all not true, or is it ? Well, after this truly fictitious event called World War Two some 55 Million are said to have vanished.

The paranoids did not stop. Currently they allege that a considerable part of the German war apparatus "changed the owner " and was run by the allied military after World War Two. There was some headache caused by this theory. How can it be that a civilized society tolerates the employment of thousands, and thousands, and even more thousands of notorious war criminals to raise even further money,  and to install a multinational, then global empire ?

No, this cannot be true.

There are some interesting examples, to quote an handful ( there are tens of thousands ):

Wernher von Braun, who allegedly ran a concentration camp – style venture, became one of the chief architects of NASA´s space program. The IG Farben Auschwitz – administrator later entered the board of a cartel member, the main financier of the Auschwitz factories reached the position of the largest bank in the world by assets in the late nineties ( to be devaluated a bit later )  and interestingly, to put the conspiracy theory to the max, exactly those corporations most deeply involved in the war complex abound within the Fortune top 500 corporations list, as well as the suppliers of the german army before / after WW II. Rather in the top 100. No, even at the very top ? Incredible....

 Justice stroke, or what was that ? One of the greatest ( early ) admirers of Schicklgruber, who later became Hitler after having failed to start a career as a painter in Vienna was Baron von Thyssen, and one of his largest ( financial ) sponsors. He set up a bank called Bank voor  Handel en Scheepvart in the Netherlands to run a discreet institution designed almost exclusively for funneling black monies into the Nazi machinery - as he stated. The business connections of this bank and the personnel involved are highly interesting for the conspiracy addict. A true speedball, that is.

The Thyssen bank, according to these conspiracy theorists, was at least one of the major shareholders of an institution called UBC. Someone called Prescott Bush, who, allegedly, got involved in legal trouble in the forties ( ! ) for an offense called "Trading with the enemy ", allegedly owned one share of UBC, later worth a sum of 1, 5 mio US Dollars. A small fish in a big pot. Anyway, who supplied the German army with tanks ? There was a company called Opel, that enjoyed the privilege of being tax-exempt during the period of the Third Reich...Opel was / is a GM subsidiary.

This Prescott guy, these paranoids state, is the grandfather of  Bushy the Great, alias George W. Bush.

How is that possible ? This is a democracy, Sir ! How dare you state that ?

So what ? Allegedly these totally whackoed out psychos also believe that General Motors, the largest car producer in the world, was one of the major suppliers of the Nazi war machine via its subsidiary Opel in Rüsselsheim, Germany. As well as one of the largest steel corps of today, KruppThyssen, two separate corporations at that time. And so on.... hallucinating they believe that the suppliers list reads like a Who is Who of the corporate world....with banks among them that finance both sides of conflicts in order to double their profits. And, not to forget, finance reconstruction and modernisation efforts. Too genial to be true, or isn´t it ?

In this particularly sterile and clean civilisatory environment no one believes that....

The conspiracy nuts even indicate that not only the Nazi war machine got its supplies from quite a few most privileged companies worldwide, but also the Soviet Union. The North Atlantic, they state, was crammed with cargo ships for a few years. They state. This in fact is too outlandish to be true. Is it ? General Electric is said to have "electrified " the Soviet Union. No, no. The economic model adopted by the Soviets resembles much of the German WW I war economy, by definishion a planned economy, highly centralized.

This is a civilisation of soap freaks and conspiracy nuts.

Well. What is true ? We live in a wonderworld where everything is possible. We are close to entering paradise. We all love each other. There are no problems. Everyone is happy and loves to dance in the moonlight. Morals and ethics rule everything, and, of course, a yet unexplained phenomenon called the law, thereby guaranteeing a perfect life for everyone, we have endless financial supplies, they even invented a perpetuum mobile-like moneymaking apparatus ( patents pending ) and miraculously, facilities that provide unlimited amounts of natural resources, energy and goods in general. Growth will continue forever.....We are ruled by god-emperors that beat out god himself. God never imagined he would be capable of creating so many miracles...due to a phenomenon called war on the weather we can expect a truly golden age, thanks to the unlimited supplies that are available....

The world simply contains these stupid, whackoed, paranoid conspiracy nuts that, due to their mental disability, project themselves into it.

Sometimes they get really dirty. These.....After the IG Farben complex, for example, became restructured, and its security branch transferred ( after a cleanup ) to the allied authorities, including cartel representatives, a variety of typical Nazi-style events occurred. This of course cannot be true because we do in fact live in a perfect democratic society, the law rules, and, as stated, we all love each other in this global Fannyland. There was this ominous operation involving so called ratlines, a mystery that sprung out of the head of a particularly paranoid maniac.

This theory contains the "fact“ that the Vatican helped a few thousand  Nazi war criminals escape to various places, South America, Great Britain, and the USA. Those left in Germany were either hanged ( for idiocy or failure, the most horrendous offenses ? ), or, the majority, revitalized to create the perfect democracy, the optimized rule of the law, and a constitutional paradise that enlightens almost everyone. Well, according to these conspiracy perverts, the brown stuff somehow, in an unexplained fashion, continously oozed out of the rule-of-the-law-framework....

These conspiracy dumbshits then point their finger at the "fact " that e.g. the majority of the well-known Latin American military dictators were educated in US military institutions and closely cooperated with mysterious entities like the "CIA", a phenomenon that they often fail to insult because it never existed, as well as a number of  Nazi emigrés that also established close contacts with the coke cartel. They claim it is not a coincidence that a number of smaller concentration camps appeared here and there, as well as torture chambers that ( they allege ) perfectly resemble places like Abu Ghraib or others.

A mysterious fantasy in this context: A red terrorist gang called "Grupo rojo ", allegedly artificially created  within Operation Condor by the chilean government, that conducted a variety of terrorist acts in Argentina, primarily.

Other peculiar nightmares put into print: The German secret service allegedly bombed various prisons or, for example, a pizza parlor in 1999. The present head of BND – the German equivalent to the CIA - is said to have explained that away by stating  "No, the agency for the protection of the constitution did not bomb these facilities ( in the case of the prisons, that is ), it simply ordered this to be done. " This makes a tremendous difference. The bombing of the pizza parlor in 1999 was handed over to a seemingly independent institution, and was never mentioned again. Currently, there is some minor confusion because peace doves from Germany appeared in Iraq to spot valuable military targets, they say, as well as the joint operation that led to the temporary extradition of someone called  Masri who later got released. Masri is - mysteriously - mentioned in the official 9-11 report ( page 165 ).

Why should the German taxpayer pay taxes for having these neat prisons bombed ? Or why should US or chilean taxpayer money be spent on setting up artificial government-run terror gangs, e.g. posing as "Grupo rojo " ? Seems to be quite irrational.

These conspiracy folks even go completely blind. They do not see any result in several  anti-terror investigations in Germany relating to a handful of older cases in the eighties, involving the killings of a few top managers. No one was found, they state. There are no convictions. There simply isn´t anyone to charge. Then they point their finger at the "fact" that the notorious Red Army Fraction, a west german terror gang, left West Germany in 1985 to get asylum in East Germany, well protected by the east german authorities. So, they state, there was no RAF anymore to be blamed for the killings of a handful of managers such as the head of Deutsche Bank Herrhausen or Hoesch ( a steel corporation ) Rohwedder, later head of the privatization unit that restructured East Germany, say, de-industrialized it to the ground.  Hallucinating they quote that investigations were commented on in an uninterested fashion by those in charge for clearing up the scenario.

The appearance of Bin Ladin, Osama, on the scene made the conspiracy nuts freak out completely. They claim he was hired as a US government agent to drive the Soviets out of Afghanistan. They construct the theory that he appeared, mysteriously, continously at the freedom-dictatorship frontline, such as in Bosnia, or in Kosovo in 1999.

He certainly was not there. Untrue is also the allegation that vast government funds were spent to run that. No, no. Bin Ladin then stated he overthrew the Soviet Union, as well as some of his chiefs.....to justify his existence. A bit exaggerated, isn´t it ?

The conspiracy freakouts even indicate that not only Prescott Bush was somehow affiliated with Baron von Thyssen, one of Hitlers major sponsors, even until 1940-something, no, these paranoid maniacs allege that Salem Bin Ladin and his family had a variety of  business cooperations run with the Bush family and numerous others, while G. W., according to their paranoid fantasies, now acts as US president.

Horrible, isn´t it ?

After the legend of the Gulf of Tongking got created  ( a set up attack of the US military against itself, so they say ) the ultimate paranoia got inserted into the public, namely the demolition of the World Trade Center. Kamikaze 2001. Dr. Strangelove´s return.

Attacks of  armies against themselves never occured, as we all know. This is not possible. The German army did not conduct an attack by SS-officers in polish uniforms to justify an extensive peacekeeping mission starting on September, 1st, 1939. No, no. This nightmarish vision of true psychotics is one of the most notorious examples of conspiracy nuthead mania that so far got produced. It is designed to scare the intimidated taxpayer and rip further money. No, the alien-run communists produced that theory.

Totally surreal also was the allegation that the peacekeeping mission in Poland was authorized by the Soviet Union in a secret agreement as of mid-1939, also referred to as the 4th partition of Poland. The alleged content: Germany invades the western part, shortly after that the Soviet Union invades the eastern part, and then there are these typically faked images of german & soviet soldiers shaking hands at the then Soviet-German frontline in  fall-winter 1939 / 1940. They even faked maps. The eastern part of Poland remained in soviet hands even after WW II had ended. Ah, not to forget: The agreement is said to have included Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and parts of Romania, for example. It certainly is untrue, because we all definitely know that Adolf Hitler – an alien-run superman that forced them all - was solely guilty for all this, and certainly the psychotic german people, that suffers from a hereditary disease called insomniac megalomania. How can it be true that Stalin appeared as one of the major prosecutors, as a matter of fact, in Nuremberg ? Well, he got ripped off, in fact.

In a tremendous act of disinformation they constructed the legend that Germany, not the Soviet Union, received an answer shortly after September 1st 1939, from the protective forces that guaranteed safety for Poland, namely France and Great Britain. Of course, as we all know, the British and French immediately started fighting against the Soviets shortly after their invasion.....this is, of course, historical fact, not fiction.

Anyway, the conspiracy cokeheads, after having stumbled into the myth that also the Soviet Union attacked Poland, and that the Germans justified their maneuver by attacking themselves in Polish uniforms ( the Gleiwitz incident, that is ), to start WW II, they do linger on creating unqualified stuff like that.

Gleiwitz never existed, Tongking never existed, and of course 9-11 never existed.

Here we are confronted with a spectacular mindset of hallucinations. These even go as far as to deny the laws of physics.
 
 

Due to an official certain report delivered by  US congress the southern tower went down in 10 seconds ( 9-11 commission official report, page 305). It collapsed into itself ( see report, page 305 ).

The spectator could watch that with genuine objectivity, overshadowed by a peculiar  haze of disbelief, again and again, again and again, and again, and so on, somewhat hypnotized by the media coverage ( allegation, continuous repetition, establishment of belief ). If someone would have taken a brick and thrown it off the WTC roof it would have taken, say, 10 seconds or so to reach the ground. Evidently, they conclude, there was an almost free-fall-speed when the towers went down. A real estate expert  even stated in public, they claim, that " they decided to pull "  in the case of WTC 7, which happened in this theory. Other experts stated that the entire scenario looked too much like a demolition - to alter their views later in a 180-degree -move. It went down a little faster than WTC I or II. Seemingly, they allege, it collapsed into itself.

The free fall speed can be explained by the fact that there was no physical resistance left to slow down and partially stop or modify / slow down the breakdown.  This, they state, requires that a large amount of bombs are being placed in  ( almost ) every floor, to be detonated simultaneously, so that the building literally implodes ( see www.implosionworld.com for various examples of implosions that look very similar to the breakdown of WTC I & II or VII ). If the stabilizing steel columns - or the 400 - meter - high central concrete WTC core - and the like are removed compeletely at the same moment     ( by explosives planted in specific key locations within the stabilizing elements ), there is no, or almost no, physical resistance left, so that the builing can come down at almost free fall speed.  The subsequent crash caused by melting columns somewhere in the upper area would have caused a completely different scenario. The upper part of the South Tower – hit at the side, not the center -  would have broken off  taking one side of the building with it, ripping that one apart, and leaving the other side ( that did not get hit ) somewhat intact. In the case of the North Tower: Imagine, they argue, how long it takes for a solid block of approx. 20 to 30 stories to crash / make its way through approximately 80 stories, step by step, and cause steel columns ( normally something like approx. 300 meters high....solid up to the ~ 80th floor ) to break ( and bend, folks ! ), others not, and so on. The image would have been quite asymmetrical, chaotic, a maelstrom of whirling and crashing components mixed in an unpredictable fashion.....this is, they say, what happens in uncontrolled demolitions, in the case of airforce bombings or in other scenarios like this, artillery attacks for example. Look at these images. Bombed buildings do not crash symmetrically. They go off step by step. Parts remain. But WTC I & II crashed in a perfectly symmetrical fashion, a surgical strike, so to say, designed to minimize damages rather than maximize them. So, these fellos argue, look at a few controlled demolitions, and get a few movies on airforce action. How do builings in a bombed city look like ? Some crashed completely, most of them partially intact, and partially ruined. Certainly not literally pulverized, as the WTC I & II buildings.

Hm, hm....how large is the physical resistance produced by a block of approx. 80 - 90 stories, partially consisting of quite solid and long steel columns that remained widely intact ?

Is it possible that another block of known size slides through it at almost free fall speed ?

The most irritating factor is the almost free-fall-speed. The lower approx. 80-90 storeys would have produced an enormous physical resistance to the upper block. Going downwards, the upper block would slowly have disintegrated and, subsequently, been distributed into the area, while LARGE pieces of steel and glass would have remained. Also, there is not a single example of a steel and glass building that collapsed due to a fire. They claim there are witnesses that heard explosions right before the collapse, such as various firefighters. Maybe a wave of several explosions ?

Then, they claim, there is this irritating fact that if a controlled demolition took place, the bombs must have been placed either within approx. one hour until one hour and a half on Sept. 11, or, because this seemingly is impossible, the day before, or some time before. To quote another expert: I can demolish any building within a week. Normally, some - maybe - several thousands, located all around in the building to be demolished, are not kept in storage in case the building has to be demolished all of a sudden. Anyway, where is the WTC security chief ? Any problems investigating  and analyzing the  rubble ? Where is that ?

So there is your conspiracy .......theory.

The effects of a crash caused by an airliner of a certain size, carrying a certain quantity of fuel, having a certain weight, being rammed into a building of a certain quality, size, material, could mathematically be defined and put into a computer simulation to make it visible. Conspiracy freaks would need not so much harddisk space & RAM  to do that. Architects and security branches of local bureaucracies either. Of course, no one ever checked whether these buildings could withstand the impact of a mishandled airliner, no, no. A supercomputer is required to predict e. g. the physical effects of a nuclear explosion done subterraneously, causing seismic effects that also can be analyzed ( and predicted ).

Now, there is this cruel theory:

-- It looked like a controlled demolition, symmetrical, a clean – cut orderly collapse, not a chaotic event usually encountered after an airforce bombing, or a fire, the buildings literally imploded, typical for demolitions and the buildings crashed within approx. 10 seconds, also typical for demolitions, while bombed buildings tend to break off step-by-step, asymmetrically.
-- Firefighters and numerous others heard ( a series of  ) explosions right before the collapse.
-- Demolitions require the usage of ( high-energy ) explosives right before the building comes down.

So there was a controlled demolition. And....

"We see little evidence that the performance of the plot was disturbed by any government action.“ ( 9-11 commission official report, page 277 )
 

Which plot ?
 
 
 

An explanatory note:

UPI Hears...

By John Daly
UPI International Correspondent

Washington, DC, Jun. 13 (UPI) -- Insider notes from United Press International for June 8

A former Bush team member during his first administration is now voicing serious doubts about the collapse of the World Trade Center on 9-11. Former chief economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds comments that the official story about the collapse of the WTC is "bogus" and that it is more likely that a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7. Reynolds, who also served as director of the Criminal Justice Center at the National Center for Policy Analysis in Dallas and is now professor emeritus at Texas A&M University said, "If demolition destroyed three steel skyscrapers at the World Trade Center on 9/11, then the case for an 'inside job' and a government attack on America would be compelling." Reynolds commented from his Texas A&M office, "It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific debate over the cause of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong, as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely to be correct either. The government's collapse theory is highly vulnerable on its own terms. Only professional demolition appears to account for the full range of facts associated with the collapse of the three buildings."
 

Excuse me that I regarded the usage of a part of this article ( also published in the Washington Times a while ago ) as fair use. Also, excuse me, I recommend the usage of doves, couriers or submarines to transport messages that contain usable evidence relating to " the plot ", due to law enforcement activities that so far remain a true conspiracy theory. A hint:
The legal results of the 9-11 plot so far are poor. Evidence that is usable and would lead to a clarification of the scenario continously disappears. Remember that the plotters do not have much to lose if they get identified. And they certainly control a part of the law enforcement apparatus. I may mention that in roughly 20 years in the legal business I have witnessed too many legal attempts based on fiction, fake evidence, fake show trials, third - class theater plays in courtrooms, files completely stuffed with artificial evidence and things like that. And too many law enforcement officials that can hardly be distinguished from criminals.